![[-]](https://vxoc.org.uk/forum/images/dark1.8/collapse.png "[-]")
13:th-Jan-2020, 17:51:33
It doesn't look too bad to me
wing, bumper, headlight, dirtshield, 2x wheels and tyres and the headlamp mounting panel, plus a couple of side trims.
the difference in the camber on the rear wheels might be within spec, or may be due to a distorted wheel.
the trouble is the cost of the parts will put the repair around the total loss area.
the headlamp is a welded on panel and so the insurance engineer/assessor may decide its a cat S (structural repair)
but good news is that the accident wasn't your fault and so it should be claimed as a 3rd party with your repair being paid for by the other drivers insurance. Usually in this situation the "no fault" insurance company will insist the car is repaired (which means it won't be total loss)
and you'll get it back all nice and (like) new.
I've repaired much much worse.
wing, bumper, headlight, dirtshield, 2x wheels and tyres and the headlamp mounting panel, plus a couple of side trims.
the difference in the camber on the rear wheels might be within spec, or may be due to a distorted wheel.
the trouble is the cost of the parts will put the repair around the total loss area.
the headlamp is a welded on panel and so the insurance engineer/assessor may decide its a cat S (structural repair)
but good news is that the accident wasn't your fault and so it should be claimed as a 3rd party with your repair being paid for by the other drivers insurance. Usually in this situation the "no fault" insurance company will insist the car is repaired (which means it won't be total loss)
and you'll get it back all nice and (like) new.
I've repaired much much worse.
retrofitted = DAB+, GM dog guard, GM reversing camera